|
|
|
8/30/2010
By Nancy Gonzalez, CFLE
A few days ago, I moved my son into a dorm at the University of Minnesota—Morris campus. He’s now 3 hours from Minneapolis and on his own. It was a difficult moment for this mom. For one thing, Dad was home sick, and I had to move him in myself. Saying Goodbye until Thanksgiving resulted in a few tears. My son asked, “Are you OK to drive, Mom?” I was. I was just so proud that we had raised such a fine young man.

He’s so interesting to talk to—he’s been quite a bit of company for his ol’ mom and dad. He’s our only child, so my husband and I are facing a transition as well. He will probably be home summers and vacations, but this is the beginning of empty nest. There’s been a lot written about “helicopter” parents. Are parents really hovering over their kids too much? Maybe. Maybe not. Is it just the times? The economy? What do kids need as we parents “launch” the young adult?
I asked a friend and colleague, Dr. Stephen Gavazzi from Ohio State, to give some advice to parents like me. Here’s what he said. (In italics)
Having witnessed my first-born son graduate from college this past spring, and with the second of my remaining three sons safely ensconced in his first apartment as a college sophomore, I reckon that I know at least a couple of things about the “off to college” experience. And only rarely does my advice to parents deviate from one consistent theme: this is NOT the time to stop being involved with your son or daughter. However, this is PRECISELY the time to reverse the direction of responsibility for deciding what kind of involvement will be most helpful.
This change of direction is rather easy to describe, harder to put into action. Think of it this way. You have done exactly what was needed throughout the years – checking on schoolwork, monitoring extracurricular activities, dispensing unsolicited advice, etc. – to help your son or daughter work up to their academic potential. All done as part of being an active and involved parent, and largely based on what YOU thought was best for each given situation you faced. And look how successful you are… your son or daughter is now off to college!
Now, however, the best way for a parent to help their freshman son or daughter is start doing something entirely new, befitting the newly evolving relationship between a parent and a son or daughter transitioning into a more adult-like status. Namely, begin to ask your son or daughter what THEY WANT from you in order to be successful in college. Or said slightly differently, ask your college freshman how they think that you can best be a resource to them while they begin their life at the university. This will allow your son or daughter to begin to take responsibility for communicating exactly what it is that they do want (and think that they do not want) from you.
Of course, the quickest and easiest answer is that they want spending money! And believe me, that request doesn’t necessarily stop when they graduate. So get used to it. But after you get past that, you will be surprised to hear what your son or daughter also wants from you, if you bother to listen. Often as not, they just want someone who will be there to listen about whatever is bothering them at the time without being judged. You won’t know what they really want, however, until you ask… and remain in a listening and accepting mode when they start to answer your question.
Steve has been right on. Eric and I are new at this, but right off the bat, he confronted a choice he had to make. He called me and laid out the situation, and I told him, “This is your choice, Eric. Let me know what you want to do.” I’ve been getting updates by email every couple of days about books, registration changes, financial aid, and other “business.” But I’ve also gotten a few descriptions of some hilarious but innocent antics that have happened with new friends. It sounds like a stone riot! And yes, I have been tapped for money. I don’t know what could be more American than a college kid calling home for money, right?
His college has been helpful by placing a lot of this information on websites specifically addressed to parents. Colleges and universities? Do more of this. If I can go to your website and find deadlines, FAQs and information we need, I can do less helicoptering. The more information I can find this way, the less I have to pepper my son with questions about these deadlines and promissory notes. It takes the nagging out of our conversations—written and spoken—and allows more time for the fun.
The most delightful part of parenting a young adult is seeing things develop in him that his dad and I never had! For example, he’s a Biology major—with a huge interest in Herpetology. (Frogs). His dad is a software engineer—I’m a family life educator. Neither of us has the slightest interest in frogs. Where did this come from? I wish someone could have told me, when he was a newborn, that parenting a young adult would be my favorite stage of parenting yet.
This helicopter is ready to come in for a landing. In my last email to him I wrote, “These will be some of the best years of your life, Eric. Soar!”

Many thanks to Steve Gavazzi, his expertise and his experienced reassurance. What makes for a successful student? Check out Steve's video on YouTube about this very subject: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgQybhvBPoo 8/13/2010
By Nancy Gonzalez, CFLE
This past weekend I was up in northern Minnesota, with my sister, visiting our childhood home and all the places that “our people” had immigrated to over 100 years ago. I brought an armful of dried flowers with me from my garden to place on all the graves of relatives passed-on. One of them is marked simply “Baby Girl—1938.” It was my father’s baby sister. She never had an official name recorded—she died shortly after birth. We all know, however, through family lore that her name was Maxine and that she was a full-term baby. I’ve heard it said that back in the days when infant mortality was much higher, one of the reasons ill babies weren’t named right away was because naming the child began the identity process, the bonding with the infant and the beginning of life. For some families, when death came so suddenly, they may have believed they could have cut this process short. In my infant Aunt Maxine’s case, however, they might as well have placed the name on her gravestone because we all know it anyway. Knowing my family’s culture, I suspect that baby Maxine was a beauty and evidence that she bonded with her parents exists precisely because her name survived in our hearts. What a tragedy. As long as relatives like me visit her grave, she will not be forgotten.
We got some tragic news yesterday about a Maxine we all know in NCFR. Maxine Hammonds-Smith was NCFR’s immediate past President. Her death was a shock to all of us staff at headquarters because, while we knew she had had a brush with cancer, we were under the impression that it was a brief episode and that it was all in the past. She soldiered on with such courage and never let on to us that anything was wrong.
As a professional association with membership all over the nation—no, all over the world—we do not usually see our members except during the conference. Maxine was the same every year—generous with hugs and affirmations. Cindy Winter came in from retirement to tell us the news—she had heard first. We sat around our conference table in shock. She was so kind to our staff. We are getting many notes of sadness here at headquarters—people who just need to tell someone what they remember about her. I will offer my memories and then ask NCFR members to comment on this blog as they feel so moved.
Maxine was one of the kindest and most positive people I have ever met. She was affirming of everyone. She was a much better person than I. If I stub my toe on the piano, I let out an “ouch!” and whine about it all day. Maxine would say “Excuse Me” to the piano, remark about all the lovely music it made and never let anyone know it hurt.
The passion that she wrote and spoke about most fervently of late was “mentoring.” Her last official task just ended a couple of weeks ago—she chaired the committee to award the first-ever Berardo award for excellence in mentoring. She was always there with advice for anyone in need. One of her areas of expertise was in retirement planning. She was adamant that planning for the future was a must, but especially for women. She invited any question I had for her, and I asked her about one of my retirement choices and she was so happy I had made a plan. She was “You go, girl!” in everything.
My most recent memory of Maxine from the San Francisco conference and a laugh we had shared. I met her walking with a woman and Maxine introduced her as her “sister.” I was delighted to meet her sister who had come to the conference! Then not long thereafter, at that very conference, she was with another woman and she introduced her to me as her “sister” too. Then, as they walked away, I was perplexed, because I distinctly remember that she wrote in one of her NCFR Report columns that she was the only girl in a large family of brothers.
Then—you guessed it—I ran into her a third time with yet another completely different woman and she, again, introduced her companion as her sister. I said, “Maxine—how many sisters do you have? You told me you were the only girl with lots of brothers!” She laughed and laughed. Then she explained that, yes, in her biological family she was the only girl. But all of these NCFR colleagues she was hanging out with at the conference were her “sisters”—her fictive kin. This is why I know the grieving will be strong throughout the organization—she is leaving siblings all over.
Maxine will be honored at the memorial service at the Minneapolis conference, and we will have a complete obituary in the NCFR Report in December. We will have more information available via email as we learn of anything. But please use this blog to leave a memory of Maxine if you’d like.
Thank you, Maxine, for being so kind and affirming of all your NCFR sisters and brothers. You will always be remembered.
7/20/2010
By Nancy Gonzalez, CFLE
Every 10 years since 1970, NCFR has published a collection of articles written by expert scholars on a breadth of topics in our field. The 2010 Decade in Review is the June 2010 issue of the Journal of Marriage and Family. If you were a member of NCFR in June, you received this fabulous publication. If you were not a member, just look what you missed. Here is its Table of Contents. (Don't worry, I'll tell you how to order it.)
• Demographic Trends in the United States: A Review of Research in the 2000s by Andrew Cherlin
• Filling the Glass: Gender Perspectives on Families by Myra Marx Ferree
• Critical Race Theories, Colorism, and the Decade's Research on Families of Color by Linda M. Burton, Eduardo Bonilla-Silva, Victor Ray, Rose Buckelew, and Elizabeth Hordge Freeman
• Poverty and the American Family: A Decade in Review by Kathryn Edin and Rebecca Joyce Kissane
• Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Families by Timothy J. Biblarz and Evren Savci
• Connecting Complex Processes: A Decade of Research on Immigrant Families by Jennifer E. Glick
• "Families" in International Context: Comparing Institutional Effects across Western Societies by Lynn Prince Cooke and Janeen Baxter
• Family Risk and Resilience in the Context of War and Terrorism by Shelley M. MacDermid Wadsworth
• Partnering Across the Life Course: Sex, Relationships, and Mate Selection by Sharon Sassler
• Diversity in Pathways to Parenthood: Patterns, Implications, and Emerging Research Directions by Pamela J. Smock and Fiona Rose Greenland
• Families with Children and Adolescents: A Review, Critique, and Future Agenda by Robert Crosnoe and Shannon E. Cavanagh
• Parenthood, Childlessness, and Well-being: A Life Course Perspective by Debra Umberson, Tetyana Pudrovska, and Corinne Reczek
• Marriage in the New Millennium: A Decade in Review by Frank D. Fincham and Steven H. Beach
• Research on Divorce: Continuing Trends and New Developments by Paul R. Amato
• Remarriage and Stepfamilies: Strategic Sites for Family Scholarship in the 21st Century by Megan M. Sweeney
• Socioeconomic Status, Family Processes, and Individual Development by Rand D. Conger, Katherine J. Conger, and Monica J. Martin
• Work and Family Research in the First Decade of the 21st Century by Suzanne M. Bianchi and Melissa A. Milkie
• Conflict, Power, and Violence in Families by Kristin L. Anderson
• Advances in Families and Health Research in the 21st Century by Deborah Carr and Kristen W. Springer
• Biosocial Influences on the Family: A Decade Review by Brian M. D'Onofrio and Benjamin B. Lahey
• Family Policy: Becoming a Field of Inquiry and Subfield of Social Policy by Karen Bogenschneider and Thomas Corbett
Are you interested in ordering it—just one for yourself or several to use as a classroom text? This special Journal of Marriage and Family June 2010 edition, can be ordered from Wiley's customer service department at 800-835-6770, either by the professor or university bookstore. Orders will need to specify that this is for volume 72, issue 3 of the journal. Individual copies are $29.50. Bookstores can order in bulk at a 20% discount. Issues will then be shipped to the bookstore's address. If the professor orders for a class, the price is also $29.50 with a 20% discount, and copies will be delivered to the professor (not individual addresses). Orders will be taken by credit card only. Order soon - delivery will be approximately one month from order date. Please note that no returns on journal orders are accepted. Due to contractual agreement with our publisher, these journals will not be available via NCFR headquarters - they must be ordered via our publisher, Wiley.
This issue of JMF is a "keeper." Order it today!
7/14/2010
By Nancy Gonzalez, CFLE
When one turns 50, there are at least two events that usher in the decade. First, AARP will hit you up for membership. Then your doctor will begin to pester you about getting a colonoscopy.
Quoting the American Gastroenterological Association, a colonoscopy is a procedure which allows the examination of the colon by use of a long, flexible, lighted tube called the colonoscope through which the doctor can view the entire colon and rectum for polyps or cancer and during the same exam remove pre-cancerous polyps. It is the test most gastroenterologists recommend as the single best screening exam for colorectal cancer. It is the only method that combines both screening and prevention (by removal of pre-cancerous polyps). http://www.gastro.org/patient-center/digestive-conditions/colorectal-cancer .
My aunt died of colon cancer, so my doctor was relatively insistent that I get checked out. Here’s the weird bit—I was absolutely terrified, and unnecessarily so. I’ve gone through some nasty medical stuff. I’ve had a C-Section. I’ve had a hysterectomy. I’ve had my gallbladder removed during which my pancreas was nudged so I developed pancreatitis, which is unbelievably painful—almost as bad as labor. Then, as a complication from the pancreatitis, fluids backed up into my stomach which I had to have drained on an emergency basis with no anesthesia—a radiologist worked by fluoroscope and inserted a tube through my abdominal wall into my stomach. There was no time to call an anesthesiologist. They didn’t even give me a bullet to bite on. I share this just to demonstrate that I am not a coward.
The colonoscopy was a terrifying prospect, and the point of today’s blog is that it shouldn’t have been. It was no big deal. I’m probably not alone in my fear, which is unfortunate; there are likely many who are as fearful or more fearful than I and therefore many who are procrastinating about getting this test. Why?
I’m convinced that most of the problem is because few people are willing to talk about it. We women have come a long way with our pink ribbon campaigns and we talk about our mammograms. Men talk about prostate health openly, including men who are public figures such as John Kerry and Rudy Giuliani—both survivors. There are few who campaign for colon health. It’s a tragedy, because colon cancer is the third most common cancer. We just aren’t comfortable talking about—let’s say it—poop… and where it comes from. We are also, understandably, worried about pain. In my case, and in the case of everyone I have talked to who’s had the procedure, they are wonderful about making one comfortable. Want proof? You can bet that if the exam were traumatic, word would get out fast.
Katie Couric took on this cause. She lost her husband to colon cancer. He was 42. She made colon cancer screening her personal campaign. She did a very courageous thing—she had a colonoscopy and had it broadcast on TV. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15JsYSZIT-Q . The video was dignified and reassuring. I watched it before I went in, and it was enormously helpful.
What was equally helpful, and this is just because of who I am, was laughing all the way to the event. I won’t provide the links here in case there are readers who may be squeamish, but there are a couple of comedy routines about colonoscopies on YouTube that are hyperbolically hilarious. If you’re like me, and love to laugh in the face of fear whenever possible, these might be just what the doctor ordered. In addition to Katie Couric’s procedure, there are many other educational videos about colonoscopies on YouTube. To find any of these, type “colonoscopy” into the YouTube search engine.
Age 50 is the recommended age to begin screening, but there are many factors, such as family history, that may make an earlier screening necessary, so your mileage may vary. Talk to your doctor—and don’t procrastinate like I almost did. I got a clean bill of health, and they don’t need to see me again for five years. Do it! 6/24/2010
By Nancy Gonzalez, CFLE
Carl Jung had a word for the eeriness when two or more unrelated events occur together in a seemingly meaningful way—Synchronicity. This past week, I came to appreciate this concept that heretofore has seemed like magical thinking. I just returned from a conference in Seattle. The same day, President Obama gave a Father’s Day address about the importance of fathers in the lives of children. So what’s the connection? For me, it’s about Seattle. It's about the anniversary of my father's death this week. And it’s about two generations of missing fathers.
When my father was 11 years old, his mother died suddenly at age 37. Within just a few hours, she went from perfect health to death by encephalitis. In her final hours, she writhed in pain with a crushing headache. My father was big for his age, and so he was recruited to help hold his mother down on the bed while she was screaming. This was New Year’s Day, 1940.
That wasn’t the only traumatic event for my dad within a year. The previous September, 1939, the family home burned to the ground. My grandfather had just purchased an insurance policy on the home the month before. The house burned while they were visiting at a relative’s house. I heard from more than one source that all the circumstantial evidence pointed toward insurance fraud. They rebuilt a house, and the family moved in just before Christmas, 1939.
On New Year’s Day, just days thereafter, my grandmother was gone. I pieced all this together years ago by hunting through newspaper microfiche and questioning elderly relatives. Just a few weeks after my grandmother’s death, my grandfather left for Seattle to work in the shipyards. He abandoned his children right after they lost their mother. The youngest was just five months old. My father and his five siblings, all 16 or younger, were left in a rural farmhouse in northern Minnesota. An aunt took the baby in. The rest of the kids spent about a year fending for themselves. That same aunt told me that she and the neighbors did the best they could, but they couldn’t cope with all those children plus their own large families. They made sure the kids didn’t starve, but couldn’t manage much beyond that. The relatives and neighbors were disgusted with the house fire incident and furious that my grandfather left. He eventually returned, but the damage was done.
Something must have happened that year to that 11 year old… my father. He lost his home to fire. He lost his mother. And he learned that his father could pick up and leave him at any time. I was born when my father was 32, and by then he was a cruel and violent person. Whether his childhood trauma is partially or completely responsible for his downfall, I’ll never know. My father was an unrepentant tyrant until his death in 1990. Ironically, I am sure my life would have been much better if he had abandoned us and left for Seattle—or anywhere.
When I got to Seattle last week, I began to think about my grandfather. He did the unthinkable—he burned down a house for the insurance money. Then he abandoned six motherless, grieving children. His moral principles were appalling. I can’t believe I share any DNA with such a person. There’s no excuse, but this was late in the Great Depression. He needed the money. (Who didn’t?) Then, after losing his wife, he was probably bereaved to the point of clinical depression. Coping alone with all those children was overwhelming. I think I know why he went to Seattle—or at least why he stayed there so long. From the 15th floor of a downtown hotel, I saw for myself the beauty of the Puget Sound. If I had to get away from it all, this is where I’d go. Which brings me back to father absence.
One of our scholars, a researcher and theorist, Pauline Boss, has studied psychological father absence in depth. Her research, and that of many other NCFR members, finds that dads do matter—by their presence or by their absence. My dad lost his father physically for a year—psychologically forever. My father was physically present, but undermined our family psychological health.
Another one of our scholars, William Marsiglio, studies the importance of men in the lives of youth. I blogged about his book, Men on a Mission, about a year ago. http://community.ncfr.org/blog/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=105 .
In the latest issue of Altantic magazine, there is an article entitled “Are Fathers Necessary?” http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/07/are-fathers-necessary/8136 . It’s a provocative question. Research will keep answering this question, but in my life, my N= 1 anecdotal answer is “yes, they are.” I have felt father loss profoundly my entire life. Evidently, my father did too. A dear friend of mine lost her father at age five. It was Christmas time. The church at which the funeral was held was decorated with Poinsettias. Forty-five years has elapsed, and she still can’t stand the sight of Poinsettias.
President Obama was abandoned by his father age two. He got a brief visit from him at age 10, then a few letters, and then he never saw him again. Obama still hurts. He vowed that Malia’s and Sasha’s lives would be different.
I took a similar vow. At age 16, I vividly remember the moment when I made the decision to study human behavior. I was in my bedroom, and I could hear my parents screaming at each other at the other end of the house. I decided not only would I study what makes people tick, if I had any children, I would make sure their lives would be different. I succeeded. My husband’s and my only child, son Eric, has had a fabulous dad. Should Eric decide to become I father, I already see the makings of a wonderful father in him. The most important thing I will have ever done—or will ever do—is being the generation that broke the cycle.
Listen to Obama’s story about father loss that is decidedly more eloquent than mine. The President’s Father’s Day message is here: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/06/21/president-obama-promotes-responsible-fatherhood-no-excuses .
Epilogue: My grandfather began to die the day he arrived in Seattle. The job he performed in ship-building involved working heavily with asbestos. He died of the resultant Mesothelioma in 1962. I have only one wispy memory of him—he died when I was 2½. I can see him sitting on our red sofa holding his arms out to me, smiling and saying, “Nancy, come here.” I remember feeling joyful as I began toddling over to him. That’s all I have from them; just one happy memory in two generations of fathers.
5/25/2010
By Nancy Gonzalez, CFLE
There’s a special kind of pain in recognizing that there’s something that everyone else understands—except me. One of the first memories I have of this is from seventh grade. I was at a junior high dance. As an aside, the word “dance” was a bit of an overstatement. As I recall, the girls stood around on one half of the gym and the boys on the other. But what I couldn’t understand were the lyrics to one of the songs at the dance—Crocodile Rock, Elton John’s hit song from that year. My hearing was excellent. I just couldn’t make out what he was saying.
For example, there’s one line that I now know is “long nights crying by the record machine, dreaming of my Chevy and my old blue jeans.” It’s so obvious now! Here all these years I’ve been trying to understand why he was so obsessed with beverages, “dreaming of my sherry and my Ovaltine.”
Mr. John has had an amazing career that must be about 40 years long by now. He’s never gone out of style. I admire not only his single hits, but his score of The Lion King, his playful choice of eyewear and, most of all, his many generous humanitarian projects. Year after year, he would release songs that were always wonderful tunes… but in almost half of the songs—half of the time—I had no idea what he was saying. I completely and freely admit this is my problem. Everyone else must be able to hear the words, or his songs wouldn’t hit the charts as they do. Especially in seventh grade, I would’ve been too embarrassed to ask someone to interpret his lyrics. Now that I think about it, it’s too embarrassing now.
Thank goodness for the internet. Now I can—via the secrecy of my own laptop—type “lyrics” and “Crocodile Rock” and it’s all laid out for me. Oh—of course! THAT’S what he’s saying! Even so, I discovered that reading the lyrics doesn’t completely answer all my questions. I just looked up the lyrics to another Elton John hit that I’ve never understood-Bennie and the Jets. Now I’ve read the lyrics, in plain English, and still I have only a vague idea what they mean. There must be something wrong with me.
What my little parable reveals are a couple of things related to family studies. Even when families “hear” a message under the best of circumstances—in their native language, with no hearing impairment—sometimes they have no idea what’s being said. What our job is, if we are to be the multidisciplinary source of information about the understanding of families, is to be the connection between what is said and what is heard. Practitioners, such as family life educators, can create that safe place to ask questions and get answers. Increasingly, this may be via websites developed for families. In the next issue of NCFR’s member magazine, there is an article that brings up the topic of the internet and our mission. With regard to disseminating information about families, we are just beginning to exploit the possibilities we have with new technology. It’s embarrassing for me to ask about the lyrics to Crocodile Rock; how joyous it was to have the internet and quickly dispel over 30 years of ignorance.
Researchers? It all starts with you. You are the composers that write hit songs. Most of the time, however, a journal article wouldn’t be understandable to a family in its original form. NCFR practitioners and CFLEs like me—then it’s up to us. By reading the research, we know what the words are. But when we serve families directly, we have to have enough of a command of research to know how to translate it into a format that can be understood by our clients. There will be times that even we don’t understand the words. We have to be courageous enough to ask our researchers “what does this mean?”
Researchers? Scholars can learn from practitioners, too. If we tell you that an unusually large number of Elton John fans cannot understand his lyrics, you can find out why.
This is the beauty of NCFR. This is where this process happens. Theory, research, translation, practice, new questions from practice, more theory and back to research. Hmmm. Reminds me of an Elton John song that I do understand—The Circle of Life.
Epilogue: I just asked my husband to read this blog, which he did. I’ve been married almost 25 years, and I thought I knew everything about him. Turns out he’s had the same problem with Elton John’s songs too. He said he never understood the line, “hold me closer, Tiny Dancer. Count the head lice on the highway…”
5/3/2010
By Nancy Gonzalez, CFLE
I recently attended the Population Association conference in Dallas and, as I do for all conference trips, I make sure to pack a book to read, usually one written by an NCFR member.
For my latest trip, I brought along a new book co-edited by Lis Maurer, CFLE and NCFR member and her co-editor Rebecca Plante: Doing Gender Diversity: Readings in Theory and Real-world Experience. It’s an anthology of articles on gender, sexuality, identity, sociology and relationships. It has the most amazing breadth of articles. Anyone would benefit from reading this book, because the reader is guaranteed to read about the life of at least one person who’s lived a unique and sometimes uncommon life much different than his or her own. I’m a frustrated anthropologist who just loves to read about how other people live. This book is a “keeper” for me.
The study of identity has been around since “I think, therefore, I am.” What this book uncovers is how identity affects the human experience across an astonishing range of populations. Here are just a few topics covered in this reader:
- Cheerleaders: are they objects? Or athletes?
- The intersectionality of gender as experienced by ethnic minorities and other viewpoints
- Articles by and about the lives of GLBT persons
- The uneasy reality of skin tone and perceived beauty
- How breast loss due to cancer affects women and their self-image
- Many articles on aspects of body image, including one about genital cosmetic surgery
- An article on pornography and its meaning, written by a man.
Have you ever read about the lives of exotic dancers? I hadn’t. Ever wondered how men and women experience garage sales? How marriage affects the choices women make as to married surname? How construction workers live their masculinity?
One topic I’d like to highlight given NCFR’s current activity is intersexuality. There are a couple of great articles on this subject. Intersexuality is a condition in which a person is born with ambiguous genitalia (physically) or ambiguous gender (chromosomally). In approximately 1 in 2000 births, infants present with an ambiguous physical appearance, creating a situation for families in which the moment of “It’s a boy!”or “It’s a girl!” is one of shock and anguish. At our upcoming conference, a scholar who has studied this population, Sharon Preves from Hamline University, will be speaking about the biology of intersexuality as well as the social implications. Our NCFR conference information is here: http://www.ncfr.org/conf/current/annual.asp
Do you teach a class about marginalized populations, gender or sexuality? Here’s a tip: you could spend a year scrounging up articles and getting reprint permissions to assemble into a course packet for your students. Or you could simply assign this book. Plante and Maurer have done the leg work for you. The link to purchase it on our members’ On the Bookshelf webpage here: http://www.ncfr.org/bookshelf.asp . Click on “gender” and you’ll go right to it. Thanks to Lis and her colleague for an extremely enlightening read!
Rebecca Plante is an Associate Professor in the Sociology Department at Ithaca College http://www.ithaca.edu/hs/depts/sociology/facstaff/rplante/ and Lis Maurer is the Program Director of the Center for LGBT Education, Outreach & Services at Ithaca College. http://www.ithaca.edu/lgbt .
5/1/2010
By Nancy Gonzalez, CFLE
Last March there was a ghastly tragedy that occurred just 10 blocks from NCFR headquarters. A toddler named Grayson lost his life in a rear-end collision caused by an inattentive driver; specifically, a driver who was reaching for her cell phone. I read about it the next day in the Minneapolis paper. When I read that the scene of the accident was an intersection I cross frequently, it had a chilling effect on me.
Back when cell phones were new to the general population, there was a popular bumper sticker: Hang up and drive. I recall the Zeitgeist from about 15 years ago about driving while talking on a cell phone: it was more of a bad etiquette thing. The conventional wisdom was that the problem was bad manners… having to honk at the guy in front of you when the light turns green was merely irritating. This is changing and fast. There is now growing recognition for the life-threatening danger of distracted driving of all kinds.
I was a young adult when Mothers Against Drunk Driving was founded. When I was growing up, drunk driving was not considered a big deal—in fact, it was fodder for jokes and phrases such as having “one for the road.” No one took your keys away. There were no sober cab programs on New Year’s Eve. There were no Designated Drivers. No one called police when a car was weaving. Drunk driving was the way to get home from a bar.
Yesterday, Oprah Winfrey’s show helped to launch a campaign, the “No Phone Zone.” Winfrey is using her considerable influence to make Americans aware of cell phone use and texting while driving. http://www.oprah.com/packages/no-phone-zone.html .
Just how dangerous is distracted driving? A report from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration contains some frightening statistics:
- In 2008, 5,870 people lost their lives and an estimated 515,000 people were injured in police-reported crashes in which at least one form of driver distraction was reported on the crash report.
- Driver distraction was reported to have been involved in 16% of all fatal crashes in 2008.
- The age group with the greatest proportion of distracted drivers was the under-20 age group.
- An estimated 21% of injury crashes were reported to have involved distracted driving.
The report’s methodology section describes the limitations of the study including what is obvious: that a driver’s admission is most certainly underreported and therefore the scope of the problem is quite likely much worse. Read the entire report here:
http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811216.PDF .
There’s a British Public Service Announcement video on YouTube about the danger of car texting. I’m not putting the link here because while it is educational, the images are graphic and disturbing. For those who are interested in seeing it, find it by entering Accident Texting while Driving in the YouTube search.
I’ve never texted while driving. (I’m not proficient enough at it even if using two hands while sitting on the sofa.) I’m not coordinated enough to place calls on the road either. What I have done, and am not proud of, is answered phone calls on the road. No more. Reading about the loss of little Grayson, so very near to my workplace, gave me the shock I needed to commit to letting it ring. We all have Caller ID on our cell phones. We all can pull off the road well away from traffic, park, and return a call. My car is now a No Phone Zone.
Let’s all take it one step further. If we call someone while he or she is driving, let’s not enable this behavior. Say “you’re driving… call me back.” Sign off and say goodbye…. for Grayson.
***
Epilogue: After I posted this blog, I discovered that baby Grayson is being honored at the federal level. Secretary of transportation Ray LaHood mentioned his tragic death in his April 29 blog. Here is the link:
http://tinyurl.com/23vmcqw
4/7/2010
By Nancy Gonzalez, CFLE
The March 2010 issue of Atlantic magazine had an interesting article on “How a New Jobless Era Will Transform America.” http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/03/how-a-new-jobless-era-will-transform-america/7919 . Author Don Peck pulls together information from many places—including scholarly sources familiar to NCFR. This article caught my eye because of two family scholars he quotes—Glen Elder and Kathryn Edin (speakers at NCFR conferences)—as well as input from Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman and other experts.
Peck’s thesis is that this recession is different—and coming out of it is going to be an arduous process with unprecedented outcomes. Some facets of society may never look the same, from the macro economy to micro-level family dynamics. It’s not over ‘til it’s over, and we will not know the fallout from this recession until things turn around. As such, Peck’s prognostications are educated guesses. But this piece resounded so closely to what I am seeing in my own circle of family, friends, and colleagues—and what I am reading far and wide. I know one guy whose company had an across the board 5% pay cut and several others whose organizations have instituted several days of unpaid furlough. There are deep-seated fears that are reminiscent of Psych 101’s learned helplessness. I’ve heard those around me say desperate things like, “I can’t keep re-inventing myself.” This is the inexpert opinion of one blogger who’s operating from a healthy dose of anecdote, but here goes—this one feels way different. Bloomberg online agrees with me, calling this recession the worst since the Great Depression. http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aNivTjr852TI
As a 13 year old, I remember the recession of 1973 when my father was laid off briefly. Back then, a layoff was an actual “lay off.” My dad was not out long and was called back by the same employer. Layoffs now are kindly-worded terminations. As a young adult, I graduated with my B.A. in 1982 in the depth of that recession. It was horrible. Psych degrees are like noses—everybody’s got one. There were 65 applicants for my first job which was clerical and didn’t require a degree. I clearly remember the recession circa 1991 when my husband and I had a new mortgage and a preschooler. I started my Master’s degree that fall—our family’s financial future was a big factor in that decision. Things were pretty scary in all three slumps. But this downturn frightens me more. The September 2008 meltdown scared the life out of me. Just a few weeks ago, I read an account of that week by Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson as taken from his memoir. He called his wife from work to say he didn’t know if the nation would survive the crisis. Then he had an attack of dry heaves. http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/andrew-clark-on-america/2010/feb/01/lehmanbrothers-bear-stearns and http://www.observer.com/2010/wall-street/hank-paulsons-dry-heave . I find it fascinating that Hank Paulson’s first sleepless night was when Bear Stearns collapsed, a few months before the meltdown. I was up that night too and have proof—I blogged about it. http://community.ncfr.org/blog/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=42
Another observation that many have been making is that this recession has been especially unkind to men. Construction, manufacturing and finance have been employment sectors that have been hit hard, and these are male-dominated professions. There’s been much said about the role reversals that this dynamic has introduced to families as women take on the sole or primary breadwinner position. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=120146408
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/06/business/06women.html?pagewanted=all
http://www.boston.com/community/moms/articles/2010/02/18/role_adjustments
Yet one more prediction is that divorce rates are artificially low right now—the thought is that people can’t afford to get divorced—that after the recession there may be a spike of divorces that represent the backlog. Divorce fees are just the beginning. What if all that’s left to divide is debt on an upside down mortgage? Here is a Washington Post article on the subject, which quotes NCFR members Andrew Cherlin and Brad Wilcox. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/21/AR2010032103139.html?hpid=topnews
I’m no expert. But I know where you can hear an expert discussion on this topic. Come to NCFR’s annual conference in November. We will have two family scholars speaking—University of Wisconsin economist Maria Cancian and the aforementioned Glen Elder—who will be talking about just this subject—the recession and its impact on families. Dr. Elder, from the University of North Carolina—Chapel Hill, conducted landmark longitudinal research on the effects of the Great Depression on families. His book Children of the Great Depression is a great read.
http://www.amazon.com/Children-Great-Depression-25th-Anniversary/dp/0813333423/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1270655471&sr=8-1.
Are there Great Depression parallels to what Glen Elder is observing in this recession? Here’s a Wall Street Journal article that summarizes a few of his thoughts. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123491027420603457.html . Here is an MP3 interview with Dr. Cancian here: http://businessmatters.net/2009/10 . Come to Minneapolis and hear them together in an interactive “fireside chat.” Conference information is here: http://www.ncfr.org/conf/current/annual.asp .
3/31/2010
Today at NCFR Headquarters, we are having spring clean up day. You know how one can accumulate paper, hang on to obsolete magazines, and generally “save” way too much over the years? I just had my sixth anniversary at NCFR, and I have piles of –for lack of a better word—“matter” than needs to go… and so do my coworkers. (The piles need to go, not my coworkers.) We’ll be in recycling heaven.
But there’s more fun—we’re having a potluck lunch, and we have a number of good cooks in the office. I brought in my contribution to the meal—a cake that says “Happy Birthday, Shirley.” My favorite actress and TV mom, Shirley Jones, is 76 today.
Part of letting go of stuff you haven’t touch in two years is scary. “What if I need it next week?” But you know you won’t. Reminds me of the Neil Sedaka song Breaking up is Hard to Do. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5fPDYPk8YE . Sing along with Shirley Jones and the rest of the Partridge Family!
On to purging!
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|